![]() ![]() So Arq lets you tweak your download speed to limit how much this fee will be. You pay based on your peak hourly retrieval rate over a month. Arq knows that you'll want to avoid that.įor Glacier, instead, you budget by choosing how quickly you want to restore. Second, Glacier imposes early deletion penalties that can add unneeded costs to your monthly bill. ![]() You can send up a lot more data and it's not going to kill you financially. So there's not as much of a compelling motivation for enforcing stored-data limits the way you do with S3 in Arq. First of all, Glacier is way cheaper overall. You don't specify an exact budget number with Glacier the way you do with S3, and there's a couple of reasons for that. With Glacier, you choose when and how to download data back from the Amazon servers so your expenditures stay low. Arq trims away older backup versions to stay within that budget. For S3, you tell it how much you wish to spend per month on data storage. You simply choose which destination you wish to use.Īrq is sensitive to your budget needs for both S3 and Glacier backups, providing excellent consumer feedback and planning. From your point of view, there's no real difference in backing up to S3 or Glacier. Overall, you choose whether to back up every hour or every day. It runs a background daemon that monitors the folders you've selected. DNP Arq cloud backup adds lowcost Amazon Glacier supportĪrq provides incremental backup support, only updating changes like Time Machine does. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |