![]() ![]() What's more, when I overclocked my RAM to 3000MHz, both Cinebench scores remained exactly the same, so you'll still get excellent desktop performance no matter what kind of RAM you've got. The Core i5-9600K's overclocked scores of 5 put a bit more distance between them, but that's still a mighty good performance all things considered. Its multicore score of 2269 was also nipping at the heels of the i5-9600K, which was just a smidge faster at 2351. It was so quick, in fact, that it even surpassed my Intel Core i5-9600K's stock result of 429, which is quite the feat for such a cheap CPU. Indeed, in Cinebench's single core test, the Ryfinished with a score of 446, putting it streaks ahead of the Core i3-8100's score of 361. Now, I'm more interested in a CPU's gaming performance than I am with how it copes with general desktop applications, but I'm going to start with the latter for a change because the Ryzen 3 3100's Cinebench R20 scores were just so darn impressive. The Ryzen 3 3100, on the other hand, has eight of them, giving it a greater capacity to multi-task than its Intel rivals. Indeed, while Intel's i3-8100, i3-9100 and i3-9100F come with four cores each like the Ryzen 3 3100, they also only have four threads. Still, if you're adamant about keeping your CPU costs under $100, then there's still plenty to admire about the Ryzen 3 3100. RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance LED 2133MHz / 3000MHz Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming ![]() Probably (although as I said above, you should probably save up for the Ryzen 3 3300X if you possibly can, as it just blows all of these CPUs clean out of the water). This can currently be had for just $75 at time of writing, which is quite the bargain compared to the regular Core i3-9100, which costs closer to $130.Īlas, I haven't been able to test either the Core i3-9100 or 9100F yet, but if their gaming performance is anything like Intel's Core i3-8100 (which I suspect it probably will be given how my other 8th Gen vs 9th Gen CPU benchmarks have played out so far), then it's likely that the Ryis still a better buy. Indeed, the only real competition that the Ryhas at the moment is Intel's older Core i3-9100F, which is a version of their Core i3-9100 CPU that doesn't come with any integrated graphics (and therefore must be paired with a graphics card in order to work). Still, when even the cheapest Comet Lake Core i3 is set to cost $122 in the US, the $99 Ryand $120 Ryzen 3 3300X already have an advantage in terms of overall value. ![]() ![]() As a result, we may be twiddling our thumbs for quite some time before we can see exactly how they compare. After all, only Intel's higher-end K series of Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9 Comet Lake processors have been confirmed for launch later this month, and there's currently no telling how long we'll have to wait for their Comet Lake Core i3s to pitch up. These include a full suite of budget-oriented Core i3 processors, but I reckon that those looking to build a PC right this second will be fairly safe in going down the AMD route. Of course, plumbing for any kind of AMD Ryzen CPU right now might seem a little pre-emptive given that Intel's new 10th Gen Comet Lake CPUs are just edging onto the horizon. As you'll soon see below, those looking for a cost-effective gaming CPU will be much better off opting for the marginally more expensive Ryzen 3 3300X right now, as it offers substantially higher frame rates for just another $20. It might have four cores and eight threads at its disposal like its Ryzen 3 3300X sibling, but this is a decidedly more modest processor when it comes to overall gaming performance. AMD Ryspecs:īuilt using the same Zen 2 architecture and 7nm manufacturing process as the rest of AMD's Ryzen 3000 family, the Ryis the new baby of AMD's desktop CPU family. Which one should you buy, though? Here's how the Rystacks up to the rest of the competition. With four cores and eight threads apiece, these CPUs aren't intended for high-powered gaming rigs, but if you're looking to keep costs down for your next PC build, then they offer a surprisingly good foundation for 1080p gaming. At long last, AMD are finally filling out their budget CPU ranks with two new processors today - the $99 Ryon test here and the slightly more expensive Ryzen 3 3300X at $120. The only things missing from their initial line-up last year were their entry-level Ryzen 3 CPUs. AMD's Ryzen 3000 CPUs made a huge impression when they launched last year, with many of them speeding straight in my best gaming CPU rankings, while the Rycontinues to be my CPU of choice in the RPS Rig. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |